Research on the Collaborative Mechanism of Cultural Heritage Conservation from the Perspective of Citizen Science Based on the “Quadruple Helix + Culture” Model

Authors

  • Zhang Ziyi zyzhang0102@zju.edu.cn Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71411/jassp.2025.415

Keywords:

Cultural Heritage Conservation, Citizen Science, Resilient Cities, Quadruple Helix Model

Abstract

In the contemporary context of constructing “resilient cities,” cultural heritage, as a vital component of “cultural resilience,” bears an extremely important mission. However, the protection, dissemination, and utilization of cultural heritage have gradually transcended the traditional scope of cultural relics conservation. It no longer relies solely on professionals in cultural heritage protection but increasingly demands the participation of the general public. Citizen science, as an emerging research paradigm, offers new ideas and pathways to break through the constraints of traditional heritage conservation models. Yet, current research and applications of citizen science in the field of cultural heritage conservation remain insufficient both domestically and internationally. In light of this, this paper aims to systematically review and analyze the application cases of citizen science in the United States, with the expectation of providing theoretical and practical support for the innovative development of cultural heritage conservation. Furthermore, based on this analysis, this paper proposes the theoretical model and application pathways of “Citizen Science + Quadruple Helix + Culture” in cultural heritage conservation, with the goal of offering new theoretical support and practical guidance for research and practice in related fields and promoting the development of cultural heritage conservation in a more scientific, democratic, and sustainable direction.

References

About CitizenScience.gov. (2024). https://www.citizenscience.gov/about/

Alony, I., Haski-Leventhal, D., Lockstone-Binney, L., Holmes, K., & Meijs, L. C. P. M. (2020). Online Volunteering at DigiVol: An Innovative Crowd-Sourcing Approach for Heritage Tourism Artefacts Preservation. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2018.1557665

Bonney, R. (1996). Citizen Science: A Lab Tradition. Living Bird, 15, 7–15. Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., & et al. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984.

Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. In Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development (pp. 1–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1

Cheng, J. J. (2019). Heritage Conservation Paradigm Based on Complexity [Southeast University]. https://doi.org/10.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2019.000349

Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. (1995).

Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003

Esmaeilian, B., Rust, M., Gopalakrishnan, P. K., & Behdad, S. (2018). Use of Citizen Science to Improve Student Experience in Engineering Design, Manufacturing and Sustainability Education. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 1361–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.124

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development.

He, H. P., & Hu, W. H. (2022). For Science or for the Public? —On the Two Approaches of Citizen Science. Scientometrics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220407.001

Hecker, S., Bonney, R., Haklay, M., & et al. (2018). Innovation in Citizen Science – Perspectives on Science-Policy Advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3, Art. 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.114

Huang, Y., & Wang, M. (2018). From “Triple Helix” to “Quadruple Helix”: The Evolution of the Dynamics of Knowledge Production. Educational Development Research, 38(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2018.01.013

Li, J. (2016). Citizen Science: A New Paradigm for Ecological Field Research. Science & Society, 6(04), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2016.04.011

Li, J. (2022). The Principles of Citizen Science. Science & Society, 12(03), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2022.03.062

Lian, J. W., Zhang, X. H., & Zhao, Y. X. (2018). Case Analysis and Experience of Citizen Science Projects in Digital Humanities Abroad. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 05, 32–40.

Additional Files

Published

2025-11-25

Issue

Section

History and Philosophy

How to Cite

Research on the Collaborative Mechanism of Cultural Heritage Conservation from the Perspective of Citizen Science Based on the “Quadruple Helix + Culture” Model. (2025). Journal of Asia Social Science Practice, 1(4), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.71411/jassp.2025.415

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.